On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:40:05AM +0000, Piotr Stopniak wrote: > Shea McCombs <shea241@...> writes: > > > > > > > I had played around with DAG usability and layout before, and I'm pretty sure > there is no better way to represent the data while retaining the same > flexibility. I did come up with a somewhat good compromise though, which I > haven't implemented but I think would work for many DAG topologies. Here's an > illustration showing a standard DAG layout, and a 'block' layout of the same > graph below it: > > http://upvector.com/aux/misc/dagvis_block.pngI'm pretty sure there are a few > cases where this would not work, but I am thinking of implementing it for > usability testing. What do you guys think? Easier or worse? (I know, I don't > like the black dots either ...) What if the graph isn't planar? The dag on top of that page can be drawn with crossing lines, but it's not clear how to make rooms cross. The black dots, though, could just be doorways connecting rooms. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
