Re: gegl ops CVS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/8/06, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does it really make sense to have a separate CVS module for this? After
all the two modules will have to be in sync anyway so it would probably
be easier to keep the operators in the gegl CVS module. We could still
release two distinct tarballs from this source if that is desired.

The core set of operations should live in the source of the GEGL
library itself, these are operations that have no additional
dependencies, and are considered necessary to make minimal use of GEGL
(porter-duff compositing operators, math operators, gaussian blur).

The ones that have to be external to GEGL in my opinion is operations
that have external dependencies (specialized file loaders), wrappings
around other image processing libraries and other things that
traditionally would be "filter plug-ins" in the legacy GIMP world.

/Øyvind K.
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
                                                -- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/                            http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________

Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux