Hi, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 21:22 -0500, Cody Russell wrote: > I was talking to pipping tonight because I made a gegl op for outputting > into a GdkPixbuf and wanted to import it into cvs. He mentioned that we > should import gegl-operations into its own module in cvs and it needs to > be organized in a meaningful way, so I volunteered to post on the list > and get some discussion on this going. > > The module could be organized into different subdirectories: > gegl-operations/ > input/ > output/ > filters/ > Does it really make sense to have a separate CVS module for this? After all the two modules will have to be in sync anyway so it would probably be easier to keep the operators in the gegl CVS module. We could still release two distinct tarballs from this source if that is desired. Sven _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
