Re: libstdc++-v3 failing to compile due to no matching function for call to ‘operator new(sizetype, sizetype)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 22:07 +1000, Zopolis0 wrote:
> I've bisected the issue (which still happens with only --enable-
> languages=c,c++ instead of --enable-languages=java),
> and 0a0c2c3f06227d46b5e9542dfdd4e0fd2d67d894 is the first bad commit
> apparently. I think I've done it wrong though, and
> that 7a42b1fa1a090ead96cc0f94a8060a9650c810d5 is the breaking change.

Again, don't guess.  You can revert one of those changes or both of them
to try.  As I've indicated, you can't just look the diagnostic output
from the compiler and guess "this is the relevant modification, that is
not".  You are compiling libstdc++ with g++, so a change to either
libstdc++ or g++ may break the compiliation.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux