Re: libstdc++-v3 failing to compile due to no matching function for call to ‘operator new(sizetype, sizetype)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 20:02 +1000, Zopolis0 wrote:
> The thing is, that builds fine, but I havent changed anything to do
> with libstdc++-v3.

Then maybe you've modified some compiler code common for languages and
cause GCC to misbehave on libstdc++ code (then stage 1 libstdc++ fails),
or maybe it causes GCC to miscompile itself and generate a compiler
misbehaving on libstdc++ code (so stage 2 libstdc++ fails).  Or maybe
some modification to the building system causes libstdc++ built with
wrong CXXFLAGS.  Who knows?  We have no idea how the code is modified.

> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:29 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:20 +1000, Zopolis0 via Gcc-help wrote:
> > > While trying to compile gcj, it breaks on a number of errors, many
> > > of which
> > > are along the lines of "no matching function for call to ‘operator
> > > new(sizetype, sizetype)". However, I have not touched this code,
> > > and this
> > > error does not appear on another branch which is a few months back
> > > from
> > > master. This leads me to believe that this is an error present on
> > > master,
> > > although I have not yet been able to locate the breaking commit.
> > > (Example
> > > of one such error:)
> > 
> > Don't guess.  Just build the unmodified trunk and if it fails
> > reports to
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux