On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:28, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:46 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:01, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:38 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 12:37, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 05:23, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > > I have been trying to make a test case for testsuite. In some statements, I
>> >> > > am getting two errors. The other error I am getting is
>> >> > > error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long'
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Can somebody help me how to write dg-error having two regexes or is there
>> >> > > any dg-option that can suppress these errors? I am making the test for C2x.
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you actually care about the "long long" error? In other words, is
>> >> > checking for that error part of the purpose of the testcase?
>> >> >
>> >> > If not, you can just suppress it, with either:
>> >> >
>> >> > { dg-prune-output "ISO C90 does not support 'long long'" }
>> >
>> > Thank you for your reply. I am testing a new type qualifier on different types like int, float, _Bool, etc. Therefore, I actually don't care about the ISO error. But I have many ISO errors for different types like "long long", complex, boolean types. So, should I add these lines for each type or can we skip it with some regex?
>>
>> If your test is using long long, bool etc then shouldn't it be
>> compiled with -std=c99 or -std=gnu99?
>
> I tried using this option but still no luck. The dg options I am applying:
>
> * dg-do compile */
> /* dg-options "-std=c99 -pedantic" */
You need to enclose it in curly braces. See all the examples I showed,
and the documentation I linked to.
