Re: dg-error having two regexes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:01, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:38 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 12:37, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 05:23, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > I have been trying to make a test case for testsuite. In some statements, I
>> > > am getting two errors. The other error I am getting is
>> > > error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long'
>> > >
>> > > Can somebody help me how to write dg-error having two regexes or is there
>> > > any dg-option that can suppress these errors?  I am making the test for C2x.
>> >
>> > Do you actually care about the "long long" error? In other words, is
>> > checking for that error part of the purpose of the testcase?
>> >
>> > If not, you can just suppress it, with either:
>> >
>> > { dg-prune-output "ISO C90 does not support 'long long'" }
>
> Thank you for your reply. I am testing a new type qualifier on different types like int, float, _Bool, etc. Therefore, I actually don't care about the ISO error. But I have many ISO errors for different types like "long long", complex, boolean types. So, should I add these lines for each type or can we skip it with some regex?

If your test is using long long, bool etc then shouldn't it be
compiled with -std=c99 or -std=gnu99?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux