On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:46 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:01, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:38 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 12:37, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 05:23, Akshat Garg <xkspr7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > I have been trying to make a test case for testsuite. In some
> statements, I
> >> > > am getting two errors. The other error I am getting is
> >> > > error: ISO C90 does not support 'long long'
> >> > >
> >> > > Can somebody help me how to write dg-error having two regexes or is
> there
> >> > > any dg-option that can suppress these errors? I am making the test
> for C2x.
> >> >
> >> > Do you actually care about the "long long" error? In other words, is
> >> > checking for that error part of the purpose of the testcase?
> >> >
> >> > If not, you can just suppress it, with either:
> >> >
> >> > { dg-prune-output "ISO C90 does not support 'long long'" }
> >
> > Thank you for your reply. I am testing a new type qualifier on different
> types like int, float, _Bool, etc. Therefore, I actually don't care about
> the ISO error. But I have many ISO errors for different types like "long
> long", complex, boolean types. So, should I add these lines for each type
> or can we skip it with some regex?
>
> If your test is using long long, bool etc then shouldn't it be
> compiled with -std=c99 or -std=gnu99?
>
I tried using this option but still no luck. The dg options I am applying:
* dg-do compile */
/* dg-options "-std=c99 -pedantic" */
