On 2018-09-03 13:47:32 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-08-24 13:18:13 -0400, NightStrike wrote: > > On what system do you have uintmax_t but not uintptr_t? Is there one, > > or is this just conjecture? > > I don't know all the possible systems. Since this is allowed by > the C standard, I assume that it's possible. Otherwise, why would > uintptr_t be optional? I've also found: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cuneiform-linux/+bug/781179 "uintptr_t is not defined under MS VC++ 6" -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
