Re: Useless pointer-to-int-cast warning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-08-24 13:18:13 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On what system do you have uintmax_t but not uintptr_t?  Is there one,
> or is this just conjecture?

I don't know all the possible systems. Since this is allowed by
the C standard, I assume that it's possible. Otherwise, why would
uintptr_t be optional?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux