Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/05/17 18:41, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> But why is it not then in libgcc?  It's not hard to write it in a
>> way that will run on all AArch64 systems.
> 
> Ah, sorry, I was oblivious to availability of 128-bit LL/SC in AArch64 base ISA.
> GCC could use those to successfully expand 128-bit CAS, as it already does for
> 64-bit and narrower, but at the moment there's no support for ldaxp/stlxp in
> GCC (neither for casp, but that's also not a part of the base ISA).

I have finally caught up a bit with this thread.

I have found both in GCC 7.1.0 and 6.1.0 that which has been written (go
figure, right =-)

With regard to double word CAS, __atomic will compile and link on
aarch64 but only if libatomic is provided, and __sync will not provide
double-word CAS at all and linking fails.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux