On 7 January 2016 at 01:18, Jim Blandy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2) Is this choice documented somewhere authoritative? I expected the >>> LSB to be the authority here, but it a) seems to be being abandoned >>> (Debian backed away from it this September), and b) only >>> cites the SysV i386 supplement, which predates C99 and things like bool. >> >> The official psABI may not be current, but it's still maintained via >> an unofficial fork, see https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki >> for links to more info. > > Thanks very much. Does GCC have a policy of following this fork at present? I believe so. HJ Lu works at Intel and contributes significantly to GCC's x86 backend.
