Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
From: Andrew Chi <achi@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:27:39 -0400
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CADj25HMcc47+9Rf_jJ5yFMi9CKjyAcjKPbwOwxV5m9nnVGoODQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4

On 3/20/2013 12:30 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:

What Ian said in the mail can be refered to: C99 6.4.4.1 Point 5.

Thank you to both Ian and jasonwucj! The standard wins again. And Iwill make sure to read it closely next time.

References:
- parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  - From: Andrew Chi
- Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
  - From: Chung-Ju Wu

Prev by Date: Re: Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7
Next by Date: Regarding the alignment limit of the alignas specifier
Previous by thread: Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
Next by thread: -flto with -g
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux