> However specifying "noexcept" turns out to be necessary at least for the
> default constructor, otherwise no "move" operation is performed (on my
> system). Saying this I refer to the code I sent you in my early message.
> May be this is due to the instantiation of "v" in the first line of main?
> Did you ever meet such a situation before?
No, I don't see how it's possible.
The code in your first message has no default constructor, so I don't
understand how making a non-existent constructor noexcept can change
anything!
I'm sorry; I made a mistake: it was the DESTRUCTOR (which IS provided)
that needed to be noexcept-ed. On my system, if I didn't so, there are
3 moves and 3 copies (as you said), while with a noexcept DESTRUCTOR no
copy occurs: only 6 moves.
GS
