Re: Question on move constructor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 January 2013 17:13, Graziano Servizi wrote:
>
> However specifying "noexcept" turns out to be necessary at least for the
> default constructor, otherwise no "move" operation is performed (on my
> system). Saying this I refer to the code I sent you in my early message.
> May be this is due to the instantiation of "v" in the first line of main?
> Did you ever meet such a situation before?

No, I don't see how it's possible.
The code in your first message has no default constructor, so I don't
understand how making a non-existent constructor noexcept can change
anything!

In the file "my_output.txt" you showed move operations like this one:

In MemoryBlock(MemoryBlock&&). length = 25. Moving resource.

If I run that code I get the same output, three moves, three copies.
If I add 'noexcept' to the move constructor and move assignment
operator then I get six moves and no copies.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux