Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx, nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:10:39 +0400
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <CAA2C=vAH=ioOSgZ1TrgLeY9L8+X513HKpDTtS6UQQGM4z2X3VA@mail.gmail.com>

2012/7/13 Ozkan Sezer:

> You may try compiling make
> from CVS-latest and see whether it makes a difference.

I tried. Result is the same.

Can anyone tell me where make is running from?



-- 
Regards,
niXman
___________________________________________________
Dual-target(32 & 64 bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64 bit Windows:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/

References:
- Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: niXman
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: xunxun
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: niXman
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: xunxun
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: Ozkan Sezer
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: niXman
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: niXman
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  - From: Ozkan Sezer

Prev by Date: "Argument list too long" error due to huge number of -I<dir> parameters in gcc command line
Next by Date: Re: "Argument list too long" error due to huge number of -I<dir> parameters in gcc command line
Previous by thread: Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
Next by thread: Regarding GCC Optimization flags and a customized profiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]