On 2 November 2011 10:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 November 2011 09:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 2 November 2011 02:01, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> >>> Now of to next problem on how to store a std::packaged_task in a container. >> >> That should work because packaged_task is nothrow move constructible, >> but it looks as though there may be a problem with the >> _GLIBCXX_MAKE_MOVE_IF_NOEXCEPT_ITERATOR code ... I'd better look into >> that too. >> > > is_nothrow_move_constructible<packaged_task<T>>::value is false, > because packaged_task's destructor is not noexcept. I'm not sure yet > if that's correct or not... It's correct that is_nothrow_move_constructible<packaged_task<T>>::value is false, but that shouldn't prevent it being stored in a container. I'll file a bugzilla report.
