On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 01:56, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1 November 2011 15:12, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> >>> Aha, this is http://lwg.github.com/issues/lwg-active.html#2067 >>> >>> Although it's only in READY status I'll apply the fix to libstdc++ tonight. >> >> Thanks a lot for having a look at this. > > I've fixed it in the svn trunk by implementing LWG 2067, and working > around some new issues I found in <future>. > > N.B. your example is still broken, because the std::thread is not > explicitly joined or detached so will call std::terminate in its > destructor. That's due to a change to std::thread that was made after > the packaged_task paper you got the example from. It can be fixed by > detaching the thread (which is safe in this specific case because the > thread doesn't refer to anything that will go out of scope before it > finishes): > > std::thread(std::move(task)).detach(); Ok. Thanks, that work fine. Now of to next problem on how to store a std::packaged_task in a container. -- Lgb
