On 2 November 2011 09:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 November 2011 02:01, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Now of to next problem on how to store a std::packaged_task in a container. > > That should work because packaged_task is nothrow move constructible, > but it looks as though there may be a problem with the > _GLIBCXX_MAKE_MOVE_IF_NOEXCEPT_ITERATOR code ... I'd better look into > that too. > is_nothrow_move_constructible<packaged_task<T>>::value is false, because packaged_task's destructor is not noexcept. I'm not sure yet if that's correct or not...
