On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9 August 2011 13:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 9 August 2011 12:38, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm compiling with -Wall -Wextra on GCC. When I passed the dame code >>>> through ICC, a few functions were flagged as unintentional overrides. >>> >>> Overrides? Only a virtual function can be overridden. >> My bad - I forgot the virtual. > > And the semi-colons, and the base class, so it's not surprising that > example didn't produce any warnings. I did a *really* bad job on that example. >>> If you mean >>> overloads, -Woverloaded-virtual will warn about virtual functions >>> which are hidden by functions with the same name in a derived class. >>> There's no warning for non-virtual functions which are hidden. >> That's too bad. Itel's ICC caught the typos. >> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/cdiag1125/. > > G++ gives the same warning for the example on that page. Intersting. I did not get one from Ubuntu 10's version of g++ (4.4.3). I cleaned and then compiled twice to make sure. Jeff
