On 9 August 2011 13:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 9 August 2011 12:38, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> >>> I'm compiling with -Wall -Wextra on GCC. When I passed the dame code >>> through ICC, a few functions were flagged as unintentional overrides. >> >> Overrides? Only a virtual function can be overridden. > My bad - I forgot the virtual. And the semi-colons, and the base class, so it's not surprising that example didn't produce any warnings. >> If you mean >> overloads, -Woverloaded-virtual will warn about virtual functions >> which are hidden by functions with the same name in a derived class. >> There's no warning for non-virtual functions which are hidden. > That's too bad. Itel's ICC caught the typos. > http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/cdiag1125/. G++ gives the same warning for the example on that page.
