>Ian: > Hmmm, yeah, that is somewhat painful. >If you want to fix this in uClibc, that's fine with me. >I've CC'ed Richard Sandiford to confirm. However, it's not hard to >imagine that, now that it works, somebody will expect to be able to use >constants defined in insn-constants.h in ways that matter for libgcc2.c. >So perhaps we should leave that as it is unless Richard thinks >otherwise. >Richard: >Actually, it was more than that. The idea was to allow target headers >such as mips.h to use constants defined in .md files. This avoided >some cases where the same constant or enum had to appear in both. So if I'm to go ahead and fix this in uClibc, would a reasonable fix be to... GCC: add -D__IN_LIBGCC2 to TARGET_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS in gcc/config/bfin/t-bfin-* uClibc: include the enum in uClibc #ifndef __IN_LIBGCC2 ? Stu
