>What if you change theClass->constructor to &class_::constructor instead?
That didn't work and I got the same error as before, however
class_::constructor worked :)
Thanks for your help and hints.
// Naderan *Mahmood;
----- Original Message ----
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gcc <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 3:42:13 PM
Subject: Re: problem porting my application to new gcc (non-const reference )
On 30 March 2011 11:30, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> I rewrte the neccessary funtion definitions again to be clear:
...
> static API::conf_object_t * constructor(API::parse_object_t * aParseObject) {
OK, this is a static function, that's what I was asking.
> template <class CppObjectClass >
> class Factory {
> typedef Class<CppObjectClass> class_;
> class_ * theClass;
> public:
> Factory() {
> static class_ theStaticClass;
> theClass = &theStaticClass;
> }
> typename class_::object_type create(std::string aSimName) {
> API::conf_object_t * object = aux_::NewObject_stub(
> const_cast<API::conf_class_t *>( theClass->getSimClass() ), aSimName,
> theClass->constructor);
What if you change theClass->constructor to &class_::constructor instead?
