I rewrte the neccessary funtion definitions again to be clear:
static API::conf_object_t * constructor(API::parse_object_t * aParseObject) {
sim_object * object = new sim_object();
//Note: the reintepret cast here is safe since SimObject is POD and
//conf_object comes first in SimObject.
APIFwd::SIM_object_constructor(reinterpret_cast<API::conf_object
*>(object), aParseObject);
object->theObject = CppObjectClass(reinterpret_cast<API::conf_object
*>(object));
return reinterpret_cast<API::conf_object *>(object);
}
...
namespace aux_ {
API::conf_object_t * NewObject_stub(API::conf_class_t * aClass, std::string
const & aName, API::conf_object_t * (&constructor)(API::parse_object_t *) );
} //namespace aux_
...
template <class CppObjectClass >
class Factory {
typedef Class<CppObjectClass> class_;
class_ * theClass;
public:
Factory() {
static class_ theStaticClass;
theClass = &theStaticClass;
}
typename class_::object_type create(std::string aSimName) {
API::conf_object_t * object = aux_::NewObject_stub(
const_cast<API::conf_class_t *>( theClass->getSimClass() ), aSimName,
theClass->constructor);
....
regards,
// Naderan *Mahmood;
----- Original Message ----
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gcc <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 2:31:42 PM
Subject: Re: problem porting my application to new gcc (non-const reference )
On 30 March 2011 10:36, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>
>>Is it a static member function?
> You mean this part:
> static class_ theStaticClass;
> theClass = &theStaticClass;
No, I mean what is the type of theClass->constructor ?
i.e. class_::constructor
