Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: horseloverFat <gabriel.satanovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:01:27 -0800
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <30987337.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (horseloverFat's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:32:30 -0800 (PST)")
References: <30983560.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D6373C7.3050403@xxxxxxxxxx> <30986943.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D63E0E3.5070004@xxxxxxxxxx> <30987337.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

horseloverFat <gabriel.satanovsky@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ian, if that option did not exist I would have recevied an error message on
> the command I issued, wouldn't I?

If you use -c, yes.  If you use it for a link command without -c, then
no.  This bug is fixed in the upcoming gcc 4.6 release.

Ian

References:
- Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
  - From: horseloverFat
- Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
  - From: Cedric Roux
- Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
  - From: horseloverFat
- Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
  - From: Cedric Roux
- Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
  - From: horseloverFat

Prev by Date: Re: FW: Huge binaries
Next by Date: Re: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler
Previous by thread: Re: Help with gcc partial link (option -ar)
Next by thread: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux