fanqifei wrote: > Thanks, Andrew. Please don't top-post. > I still not understand when the insn "insv" in target.md can be used > in the RTL representation of the code. I already told you in my previous message. Did you not see it? __builtin_mips_insv Andrew. > 2009/12/18 Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> fanqifei wrote: >>> The instruction sequence generated by gcc can be simply rewritten by >>> three instructions. >>> Apparently gcc should find the expression storing to bit-field and use >>> pattern insv. But it didn't. >>> >>> gcc: >>> 10: 3c03fff3 lui v1,0xfff3 >>> 14: 3463ffff ori v1,v1,0xffff >>> 18: 8ca20000 lw v0,0(a1) >>> 1c: 3c040008 lui a0,0x8 >>> 20: 00431824 and v1,v0,v1 >>> 24: 00641825 or v1,v1,a0 >>> >>> with ins: >>> lw v0,0(a1) >>> ori a0, $0, 2 >>> ins v0,v0,19,18 >> I can't see anything in gcc that would use an ins instruction to do that. >> >> Andrew. >> > > >