Re: Via Nano CPU -march=native options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joanna Pierożek <akai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Setting -march=native and -mtune=native flags on a Via Nano U2250
> produces Core2 optimized code that works very poorly on this CPU
> (programs fail or don't compile). I wonder if it was a conscious
> decision of GCC developers to set -march=native options for Via Nano to
> these values?

It was not a conscious decision.  As far as I know there is no
specific support in gcc for the Via Nano.  This is the kind of thing
which is normally contributed by some interested party with a copy of
the detailed instruction architecture and timings for the processor.

That said, I can understand why a program might run slowly when using
-mtune=native.  But I don't understand why a program would fail to
compile.

If a program fails to run when using -march=native, presumably due to
the use of some instruction not available on the processor, then
please file a bug with a test case, following the instructions at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html .  Thanks.

Ian


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux