Re: -static-libstdc++ ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Robert Oeffner" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'm wondering how this restriction on libstdc++ in GCC 4.4 impacts on
> ports done of GCC to interix. AFAIK there are issues with the binutils
> provided by MS on interix so it is only possible to build static
> libraries on that platform.
>
> Are you saying that building any statically linked libstdc++ is never
> going to work until the arrival of GCC 4.5?

No.  The option -static-libstdc++ says that, if a system supports both
statically linking libstdc++ and dynamically linking it, prefer
statically linking it (normally the default is to dynamically link).

On a system which does not support dynamically linking libstdc++, the
option has no effect.

Ian


> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:08 AM
> To: "Tovrea, George W (US SSA)" <george.tovrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: -static-libstdc++ ??
>
>> "Tovrea, George W (US SSA)" <george.tovrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> The option -static-libstdc++ result in "undefined option" and
>>> trying to link in .../libstdc++.a fails with tons of undefined
>>> references.
>>
>> -static-libstdc++ will be a new option in gcc 4.5.  It is not
>> supported in gcc 4.4 or earlier.
>>
>> What sort of undefined references do you see?
>>
>> Ian
>>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux