>Like I said, this works for me, and for many others too. I have single core, P4. So I think -j does not make any sense. Is it right? I use a library for my code which has lots of templates and header files. Thats why I need to reduce compile time. I do not know what information you need, but I am ready to provide what you want. I use gcc 3.3 Thanks, Andrew Haley wrote: > > mahmoodn writes: > > > > I mean (I think): > > "Allow N jobs at once" != "reduce compile time" > > Like I said, this works for me, and for many others too. > > > I did this to see the effect of "make -j": > > > > ]# rm *.o > > ]# make > > ....( 10 minute ) > > > > then I edit one of my files (only one statement), and then: > > ]# make -j > > ...( still 10 minute ) > > Perhaps you should have explained your problem better. There's > nothing we can do to make a single compilation of a single file go > faster. However, that's not the usual problem. > > I wonder why your compilation is taking so long. It might be a bug in > gcc. Perhaps we could look at a test case. > > Andrew. > > -- > Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, > Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK > Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reduce-compilation-times--tf4880765.html#a13987559 Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
