Re: Is fixinclude needed on modern systems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/27/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > I've been working on building a few crosscompilers lately, and since
> > > > 4.1.2 release I've now started getting errors with fixinclude target
> > > > (probably unrelated), so I've started looking up the need for this,
> > > > and I've started wondering if it is still needed on modern systems.
> > >
> > > Yes, fixincludes is still needed on modern systems.
> >
> > any chance of an explanation ?  "yes" doesnt really satisfy the curious
> > ;)
>
> An easy recent example is that gcc's handling of "extern inline"
> changed in -std=c99 mode, and fixincludes changes glibc's uses of
> "extern inline" accordingly.

What does fixincludes actually do?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux