Niklaus writes: > On 4/11/06, gamerChad <gamerChad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hey thanks for the response Niklaus-2. > > > > I'm betting this is a problem with either the options I use on configure or > > the files I am building from in the gcc-3.3.3 folder, somewhat like your > > possibility number 2. I don't think it is the binutils, because I obtained > > binutils as binaries and did not build them myself, I am pretty sure those > > work correctly. > > > > It seems to me that the make process is using the wrong assembler, as it is > > using the i686 on this .asm file that appears to be an ARM assembly file. > > i686 assembler will not be able to correctly assemble ARM code :) > > > > I think I need to give more info, sorry I didn't already. > > > > The compiler being used to compile the cross-compiler is gcc version 3.3.5. > > I beleive it came with my debian distro. > > The cross-compiler I am trying to build is gcc version 3.3.3, targeted at > > the arm-wince-pe platform. I am using files from Mamaich's PocketGCC > > (headers and libs) to make up for what gcc v3.3.3 distro doesn't have. I > > found the Mamaich gcc here: > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96949 > > I am unable to configure and build Mamaich's PocketGCC itself. I could > > probably build it in its distro state, but that would defeat the purpose > > because I need to be able to configure this thing. > > The assembler I want it to use was part of a debian binutils package that > > targets arm-wince-pe. I have actually managed to compile stuff with an > > arm-wince-pe-gcc from a related package. Those can be found at this site: > > http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/pocketpc-gcc > > I chose to build gcc v3.3.3 because it is what Mamaich used, and since I > > will probably be putting some of his files into this compiler, I figure it > > would help if the versions matched. I am doing this combo of gcc v3.3.3 > > distro with Mamaich pgcc because it worked for someone else. > > > > I am not building binutils myself because I do not feel I need to. I'm > > pretty sure the ones someone else has built will do just fine. What I want > > to do is configure my own compiler, the other stuff can be pre-built. Let > > me know if this won't work. > > > > So I wonder, why is it using the wrong assembler? How do I make it use the > > right one (I'm already using --with-build-time-tools=dir)? Am I wrong about > > that? When you configured the compiler, what --with-as= and --with-ld= args did you use? Andrew.
