Re: I think it's using the wrong assembler, please help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/11/06, gamerChad <gamerChad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey thanks for the response Niklaus-2.
>
> I'm betting this is a problem with either the options I use on configure or
> the files I am building from in the gcc-3.3.3 folder, somewhat like your
> possibility number 2.  I don't think it is the binutils, because I obtained
> binutils as binaries and did not build them myself, I am pretty sure those
> work correctly.
>
> It seems to me that the make process is using the wrong assembler, as it is
> using the i686 on this .asm file that appears to be an ARM assembly file.
> i686 assembler will not be able to correctly assemble ARM code :)
>
> I think I need to give more info, sorry I didn't already.
>
> The compiler being used to compile the cross-compiler is gcc version 3.3.5.
> I beleive it came with my debian distro.
> The cross-compiler I am trying to build is gcc version 3.3.3, targeted at
> the arm-wince-pe platform.  I am using files from Mamaich's PocketGCC
> (headers and libs) to make up for what gcc v3.3.3 distro doesn't have.  I
> found the Mamaich gcc here:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96949
> I am unable to configure and build Mamaich's PocketGCC itself.  I could
> probably build it in its distro state, but that would defeat the purpose
> because I need to be able to configure this thing.
> The assembler I want it to use was part of a debian binutils package that
> targets arm-wince-pe.  I have actually managed to compile stuff with an
> arm-wince-pe-gcc from a related package.  Those can be found at this site:
> http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/pocketpc-gcc
> I chose to build gcc v3.3.3 because it is what Mamaich used, and since I
> will probably be putting some of his files into this compiler, I figure it
> would help if the versions matched.  I am doing this combo of gcc v3.3.3
> distro with Mamaich pgcc because it worked for someone else.
>
> I am not building binutils myself because I do not feel I need to.  I'm
> pretty sure the ones someone else has built will do just fine.  What I want
> to do is configure my own compiler, the other stuff can be pre-built.  Let
> me know if this won't work.
>
> So I wonder, why is it using the wrong assembler?  How do I make it use the
> right one (I'm already using --with-build-time-tools=dir)?  Am I wrong about
> that?
I have never used that option. So i am not sure.
Well you can edit the make file .
What does ld --help | grep targets
command give as the output.

> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-think-it%27s-using-the-wrong-assembler%2C-please-help-t1427638.html#a3857983
> Sent from the gcc - Help forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux