On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 04:13:47PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:50:26AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > > > Sorry about this trouble to you. Sure, this's a behavioural change, and it's > > been talked several times. Generally, even with this change, fstests only run > > tests/generic and tests/$FSTYP cases by default. So it won't run tests/btrfs > > cases if FSTYP=ext4. But with this change a fs has chance to force to try > > another fs' case by specify the case name particularly (if the tester thinks > > it's good to him). > > Yeah, it's not a big deal, and I saw the discusion, and I didn't > realize that it would cause the regression test failure for my test > runner. It was relatively easy for my to work around it, but I > thought it would be useful mention it in case it would take anyone > else by surprise. Sure, you're right, thanks for this reminder! > > - Ted >
