Re: [ANNOUNCE] fstests: for-next branch updated to v2024.07.14

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:50:26AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> 
> Sorry about this trouble to you. Sure, this's a behavioural change, and it's
> been talked several times. Generally, even with this change, fstests only run
> tests/generic and tests/$FSTYP cases by default. So it won't run tests/btrfs
> cases if FSTYP=ext4. But with this change a fs has chance to force to try
> another fs' case by specify the case name particularly (if the tester thinks
> it's good to him).

Yeah, it's not a big deal, and I saw the discusion, and I didn't
realize that it would cause the regression test failure for my test
runner.  It was relatively easy for my to work around it, but I
thought it would be useful mention it in case it would take anyone
else by surprise.

					- Ted




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux