Re: [ANNOUNCE] fstests: for-next branch updated to v2024.07.14

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:44:54AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:00:37PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > 2. Most of cases have removed '_supported_fs' line. From now on, if you don't
> >    need a specific white or black fs list for a case, don't need _supported_fs
> >    line.
> 
> A side effect of this change was that it triggered a failure in my GCE
> test-appliance's regression test suite.  That's because one of the
> things the regression tests run is: 
> 
> 	gce-xfstests -c ext4/4k,btrfs/4k btrfs/001 generic/001 generic/002
> 
> and previously, when testing the ext4/4k configuration, btrfs/001
> would be skipped due to its "_supported_fs btrfs" line.  Now, the test
> is actually run, and it fails (unsurprisingly).
> 
> I'm going to work around this in my test appliance, so I'm not asking
> that the change be reverted, but I thought I would point out that this
> does result in a behavioural change in some corner cases.

Hi Ted,

Sorry about this trouble to you. Sure, this's a behavioural change, and it's
been talked several times. Generally, even with this change, fstests only run
tests/generic and tests/$FSTYP cases by default. So it won't run tests/btrfs
cases if FSTYP=ext4. But with this change a fs has chance to force to try
another fs' case by specify the case name particularly (if the tester thinks
it's good to him).

If you or anyone find regressions from it, please feel free to report to
fstests@.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
>        	    		       	       	      - Ted
> 
> commit 71b003b9ad0a0f0e4bf91619702addd0bb552f7d
> Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Jul 15 11:34:30 2024 -0400
> 
>     test-appliance: exclude tests that are not supported for the file system type
>     
>     This is needed due to upstream xfstests commit f2c179ef055d ("remove
>     spurious _supported_fs calls").
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/test-appliance/files/root/runtests.sh b/test-appliance/files/root/runtests.sh
> index f59305b0..817d51f2 100755
> --- a/test-appliance/files/root/runtests.sh
> +++ b/test-appliance/files/root/runtests.sh
> @@ -386,6 +386,14 @@ do
>  	    AEX="$AEX -E /tmp/exclude-tests"
>  	fi
>  	if test ! -f "$RESULT_BASE/tests-to-run" ; then
> +	    case "$BASE_FSTYPE" in
> +		ext2|ext3|ext4)
> +		    tests_regexp="ext4"
> +		    ;;
> +		*)
> +		    tests_regexp="$BASE_FSTYPE"
> +	    esac
> +	    tests_regexp="^($tests_regexp|shared|generic|perf|selftest)"
>  	    bash ./check -n $FSTESTSET >& /tmp/tests-to-run.debug
>  	    ret="$?"
>  	    echo "Exit status $ret" >> /tmp/tests-to-run.debug
> @@ -396,6 +404,7 @@ do
>  	    fi
>  	    bash ./check -n $FSTESTSET 2> /dev/null | \
>  		sed -e '1,/^$/d' -e '/^$/d' | \
> +		grep -E "$tests_regexp" | \
>  		sort > "$RESULT_BASE/tests-to-run"
>  	    nr_tests=$(wc -l < "$RESULT_BASE/tests-to-run")
>  	    if test "$nr_tests" -ne 1
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux