On 9/14/23 00:33, Zorro Lang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 08:32:40PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
I wanted to verify tests using the command "btrfs scrub start" and
found that there are many more test cases using "btrfs scrub start"
than what is listed in the group.list file. So, get them to the scrub
group.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/btrfs/011 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/027 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/060 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/062 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/063 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/064 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/065 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/067 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/068 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/069 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/070 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/071 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/074 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/148 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/195 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/261 | 2 +-
16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/011 b/tests/btrfs/011
index 852742ee8396..ff52ada94a17 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/011
+++ b/tests/btrfs/011
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
# performed, a btrfsck run, and finally the filesystem is remounted.
#
. ./common/preamble
-_begin_fstest auto replace volume
+_begin_fstest auto replace volume scrub
noise_pid=0
[snip]
# Import common functions.
. ./common/filter
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/069 b/tests/btrfs/069
index 6e798a2e5061..824ca3c3110b 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/069
+++ b/tests/btrfs/069
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
# running in background.
#
. ./common/preamble
-_begin_fstest auto replace scrub volume
+_begin_fstest auto replace scrub volume scrub
The btrfs/069 has been in "scrub" group, others looks good to me.
Oh no! Would you please remove this line and merge it?
Or, I can fix it in the upcoming PR. Or, I can reroll this
patch.
Thank you!
