On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 08:32:40PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > I wanted to verify tests using the command "btrfs scrub start" and > found that there are many more test cases using "btrfs scrub start" > than what is listed in the group.list file. So, get them to the scrub > group. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/btrfs/011 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/027 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/060 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/062 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/063 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/064 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/065 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/067 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/068 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/069 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/070 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/071 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/074 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/148 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/195 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/261 | 2 +- > 16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/011 b/tests/btrfs/011 > index 852742ee8396..ff52ada94a17 100755 > --- a/tests/btrfs/011 > +++ b/tests/btrfs/011 > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > # performed, a btrfsck run, and finally the filesystem is remounted. > # > . ./common/preamble > -_begin_fstest auto replace volume > +_begin_fstest auto replace volume scrub > > noise_pid=0 [snip] > # Import common functions. > . ./common/filter > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/069 b/tests/btrfs/069 > index 6e798a2e5061..824ca3c3110b 100755 > --- a/tests/btrfs/069 > +++ b/tests/btrfs/069 > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > # running in background. > # > . ./common/preamble > -_begin_fstest auto replace scrub volume > +_begin_fstest auto replace scrub volume scrub The btrfs/069 has been in "scrub" group, others looks good to me.
