On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 02:25:31 +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > We should let xfsprogs decide how xfs_info works. xfs_info doesn't always > depends on xfs_spaceman, old xfs_info might use xfs_db or other things to > get xfs info, and I don't know if it'll be changed to use other command in > the future again. > > So this change will cause all cases which call _require_acl_get_max will notrun > on old (maybe future) xfsprogs which doesn't has xfs_spaceman "info" command. > I think that's not what we want, so I'd like to drop this patch. Thanks for > your understanding. I wasn't aware that the xfs_info->xfs_spaceman call path was a new change. With that in mind, I agree it makes sense to drop this patch. Cheers, David
