Re: [PATCH] fstests: get section config after RUN_SECTION checks

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 03:32:10PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> While trying to do
> 
> ./check -s <some section>
> 
> I was failing because I had a section defined higher than <some section>
> that had TEST_DEV=/some/nonexistent/device, since I was using the other
> section to test an experimental drive.  This appears to be because we
> run through all of the sections, and when getting the section config we
> check to see if it's valid, and in this case the section wasn't valid.
> 
> The section I was actually trying to use was valid however.  Fix check
> to see if the section we're trying to run is in our list of sections to
> run first, and then if it is get the config at that point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

May you provide any specific config examples to clarify what kind of issue
you feel wrong, and what kind of usage you hope to support :)

Thanks,
Zorro

>  check | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/check b/check
> index 0b2f10ed..ad0ab3cf 100755
> --- a/check
> +++ b/check
> @@ -678,7 +678,6 @@ function run_section()
>  
>  	OLD_FSTYP=$FSTYP
>  	OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS=$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS
> -	get_next_config $section
>  
>  	# Do we need to run only some sections ?
>  	if [ ! -z "$RUN_SECTION" ]; then
> @@ -708,6 +707,8 @@ function run_section()
>  		fi
>  	fi
>  
> +	get_next_config $section
> +
>  	mkdir -p $RESULT_BASE
>  	if [ ! -d $RESULT_BASE ]; then
>  		echo "failed to create results directory $RESULT_BASE"
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux