On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:19:35AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:38:23AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > It's almost 6 years since I've taken the maintainership of fstests, and > > I tried my best to keep the pace of weekly update, or at least bi-weekly > > update due to something like public holidays. > > > > But it's been a month since last fstests update due to my personal > > urgent issues, and some patches got no review for more than one month. > > So I think it's time to re-consider the maintainership of fstests. > > > > I will have less spare time in the foreseeable future, as I have to > > spend more time on my family, so it's hard to keep the weekly update > > pace. And six years is a long time, I think it's time to have a new > > maintainer. > > Hi Eryu, > > By thinking about it a while, I get up my courage to apply this job, although I Glad to hear that! I'm sure you can do it well! I'll talk to you to see how to make the transfor of maintainer go smoothly. Thanks, Eryu > know I'm not the best one can handle this job. Just this project is really > useful for my team. Nearly from I joined Red Hat, my jobs started to around the > xfstests. It's a great testsuit, which can cover most of our testing. I felt > relieved when you toke this maintainer, and admired your courage at that time, > that really helps us a lot. No matter what you decide, thanks again for all your > help, as previous colleague, as friend. > > Thanks, > Zorro > > > > > Or we could go to the group-maintain way? As Darrick mentioned before > > (for xfs not fstests, if I recall correctly). Then we need a new primary > > maintainer :) > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks, > > Eryu > > > > P.S. > > I'll keep the maintainer role and do the review & update as usual until > > all things settle down. > > >
