Re: maintainership of fstests

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:38:23AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> It's almost 6 years since I've taken the maintainership of fstests, and
> I tried my best to keep the pace of weekly update, or at least bi-weekly
> update due to something like public holidays.
> 
> But it's been a month since last fstests update due to my personal
> urgent issues, and some patches got no review for more than one month.
> So I think it's time to re-consider the maintainership of fstests.
> 
> I will have less spare time in the foreseeable future, as I have to
> spend more time on my family, so it's hard to keep the weekly update
> pace. And six years is a long time, I think it's time to have a new
> maintainer.

Hi Eryu,

By thinking about it a while, I get up my courage to apply this job, although I
know I'm not the best one can handle this job. Just this project is really
useful for my team. Nearly from I joined Red Hat, my jobs started to around the
xfstests. It's a great testsuit, which can cover most of our testing. I felt
relieved when you toke this maintainer, and admired your courage at that time,
that really helps us a lot. No matter what you decide, thanks again for all your
help, as previous colleague, as friend.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> Or we could go to the group-maintain way? As Darrick mentioned before
> (for xfs not fstests, if I recall correctly). Then we need a new primary
> maintainer :)
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Eryu
> 
> P.S.
> I'll keep the maintainer role and do the review & update as usual until
> all things settle down.
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux