On 3/21/22 11:19 AM, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:38:23AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> It's almost 6 years since I've taken the maintainership of fstests, and >> I tried my best to keep the pace of weekly update, or at least bi-weekly >> update due to something like public holidays. >> >> But it's been a month since last fstests update due to my personal >> urgent issues, and some patches got no review for more than one month. >> So I think it's time to re-consider the maintainership of fstests. >> >> I will have less spare time in the foreseeable future, as I have to >> spend more time on my family, so it's hard to keep the weekly update >> pace. And six years is a long time, I think it's time to have a new >> maintainer. > > Hi Eryu, > > By thinking about it a while, I get up my courage to apply this job, although I > know I'm not the best one can handle this job. Just this project is really > useful for my team. Nearly from I joined Red Hat, my jobs started to around the > xfstests. It's a great testsuit, which can cover most of our testing. I felt > relieved when you toke this maintainer, and admired your courage at that time, > that really helps us a lot. No matter what you decide, thanks again for all your > help, as previous colleague, as friend. Hi Zorro - I'm sure that you would do well as a new maintainer, even if it requires some learning. Every new challenge requires learning. :) If you are able to balance it with your other tasks, I would be happy to see you take this on, if it's something you want to do. (See also Darrick's suggestion that maintainer tasks could be split up a bit, across the different filesystems.) Thanks, -Eric > Thanks, > Zorro > >> >> Or we could go to the group-maintain way? As Darrick mentioned before >> (for xfs not fstests, if I recall correctly). Then we need a new primary >> maintainer :) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> Eryu >> >> P.S. >> I'll keep the maintainer role and do the review & update as usual until >> all things settle down. >> >
