Re: [PATCH] common/btrfs: source module file

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 05/11/2021 23:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:


On 5.11.21 г. 13:04, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

btrfs/249 fails with:

QA output created by 249
./common/btrfs: line 425: _require_loadable_fs_module: command not found
./common/btrfs: line 432: _reload_fs_module: command not found
ERROR: not a btrfs filesystem: /media/scratch

Fix this by sourcing common/module in the btrfs common file.

I'm not sure why you get such a failure. Without the relevant
btrfs-progs and btrfs kernel patches, I don't get that error:

I checked all these tests and btrfs/248 and btrfs/249 do not import
common/module whilst the others do it so this might be one of the reason.

Odd btrfs/248 runs fine here.


 Thanks for the report and the fix.

I still can't find the reason why btrfs/249 runs fine on my test system here. (It is the same error as shown in Filipe email).

IMO it would be cleaner to source it in common/btrfs to remove the
duplication.


Anyways, in general adding common/module to common/btrfs is a good cleanup.

- Anand


Sure that works with me. Will send a v2.

   Luis





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux