Re: [PATCH] common/btrfs: source module file

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:04:46AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > btrfs/249 fails with:
> >
> > QA output created by 249
> > ./common/btrfs: line 425: _require_loadable_fs_module: command not found
> > ./common/btrfs: line 432: _reload_fs_module: command not found
> > ERROR: not a btrfs filesystem: /media/scratch
> >
> > Fix this by sourcing common/module in the btrfs common file.
> 
> I'm not sure why you get such a failure. Without the relevant
> btrfs-progs and btrfs kernel patches, I don't get that error:

Are you using a latest fstests?

> Maybe Anand, who authored the test, may have an idea.
> We do have many other tests that call
> _require_btrfs_forget_or_module_loadable(), btrfs/124, 125, 163, 164,
> etc. Does it happen with those as well?

If that was not an issue before, maybe it is because of
commit b47ea0c6973 ("common/module: use patient module removal").

> Also, in the future please CC linux-btrfs for changes related to btrfs tests.

Will do, thanks!

 Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux