On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 5.11.21 г. 13:04, Filipe Manana wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> btrfs/249 fails with: > >> > >> QA output created by 249 > >> ./common/btrfs: line 425: _require_loadable_fs_module: command not found > >> ./common/btrfs: line 432: _reload_fs_module: command not found > >> ERROR: not a btrfs filesystem: /media/scratch > >> > >> Fix this by sourcing common/module in the btrfs common file. > > > > I'm not sure why you get such a failure. Without the relevant > > btrfs-progs and btrfs kernel patches, I don't get that error: > > I checked all these tests and btrfs/248 and btrfs/249 do not import > common/module whilst the others do it so this might be one of the reason. Odd btrfs/248 runs fine here. > IMO it would be cleaner to source it in common/btrfs to remove the > duplication. Sure that works with me. Will send a v2. Luis