On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:44:43PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Use _scratch_xfs_check, not _xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Good to me, Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> > tests/xfs/291 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/291 b/tests/xfs/291 > index 8a4b1354..adef2536 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/291 > +++ b/tests/xfs/291 > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ done > _scratch_unmount > # Can xfs_repair and xfs_check cope with this monster? > _scratch_xfs_repair >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_repair failed" > -_xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed" > +_scratch_xfs_check >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed" > > # Yes they can! Now... > # Can xfs_metadump cope with this monster? >
