[PATCH 17/24] xfs: refactor _xfs_check calls to the scratch device

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Use _scratch_xfs_check, not _xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tests/xfs/291 |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff --git a/tests/xfs/291 b/tests/xfs/291
index 8a4b1354..adef2536 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/291
+++ b/tests/xfs/291
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ done
 _scratch_unmount
 # Can xfs_repair and xfs_check cope with this monster?
 _scratch_xfs_repair >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_repair failed"
-_xfs_check $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed"
+_scratch_xfs_check >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "xfs_check failed"
 
 # Yes they can!  Now...
 # Can xfs_metadump cope with this monster?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux