On 13-01-10 09:38 PM, Akira TAGOH wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:behdad@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > I don't think we should validate. Just pass data around. Should we call it > OT_FEATURES or more generically FONT_FEATURES? If and when we add AAT support > (or the existing Graphite support), those backends will use these same tags as > far as HarfBuzz API is concerned. CSS calls them font-features, that's why I > chose that. > > > Aha. that sounds good then. let's call it FONT_FEATURES. Humm. In case we may want to add code to list all features from the font in the future, perhaps we should call this ENABLE_FONT_FEATURES? -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
