Re: Prgname and font-features?

[Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't think we should validate.  Just pass data around.  Should we call it

OT_FEATURES or more generically FONT_FEATURES?  If and when we add AAT support
(or the existing Graphite support), those backends will use these same tags as
far as HarfBuzz API is concerned.  CSS calls them font-features, that's why I
chose that.

Aha. that sounds good then. let's call it FONT_FEATURES.

 

Right.  That's why I've been putting this off.  I need to extend the

PangoAttribute framework to allow "reducing" a set of attributes to a single
value, in this case, add the lists of features together or something.

Right. that too.

 

Ok, I'll push it up.  Any name preference? FC_PRGNAME is fine?  Should

DefaultSubstitute try to populate that using system-specific heuristics?
(/proc/self/exe or something)

Yep sounds good to me.

 

behdad

--
Akira TAGOH

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig