On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I agree. I've written more code to test it. > Yet Fontforge shows no glyph there, my xsl-fo formatter reports it missing > so I must assume it is not there? maybe no, it's not there. > In which case should I be reporting a bug? > Or is there some 'gotcha' which says there is a glyph there but only if ..... I guess you better try to check with the fontconfig in the git repo. if you still see this issue, it may be worth filing a bug. I can't say more by off hand so far. it may be a bug in fontconfig or fonts perhaps. > So my question now is, are the bit positions in the matrix > dependent on any other conditions (assuming I am interpreting > the matrix correctly) It's computed from what glyphs a font actually has and the blank configuration. -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
